Communication 220 -- Mass Media and Society

Prof. Tarleton Gillespie
Spring 2005

Tues+Thurs 11:40am - 12:55pm
Kaufman Auditorium, Goldwin-Smith Hall

e-mail: tlg28@cornell.edu
office hours: Thurs. 3-5pm, 315 Kennedy

 

synopsis
 

We are all immersed in a complex and pervasive media culture, which makes it particularly difficult for us to recognize the complex relationship between media and society: how what we see is in some ways the product of our society and its particular political, economic, and cultural shape, and how what we see also shapes our understanding of ourselves, our community, and our world. This course builds on the insights of mass communication research to examine specifically this complex give-and-take. We will examine the production of culture inside of a powerfully concentrated media industry, the consumption of media inside of complex social contexts, and the shape of media technology and its impact on what we see and hear. Then we will investigate contemporary media culture in order to understand how mass media frames our experience the world out there and shapes our political process, and how mass media intersects with our understanding of ourselves and our participation in culture. We will work through the seeming contradiction that media is powerfully shaped by political and economic forces, and that we as viewers have a great deal of flexibility in how we make sense of the media we encounter. We will bring the lessons of media studies to the media culture that surrounds us, and also speculate whether any of the new technologies, genres, or industry arrangements require us to reconsider those lessons.

 

requirements
 

The most important assignment is to complete all of the reading assigned; comprehension of the arguments is crucial to your success in this course. Attendance is also required; attendance may be taken at my discretion. There will be three written assignments (20% of grade each) during the semester that will ask you to make specific inquiries into the media culture in your own lives. The final (40% of grade) will be a take-home exam in which you respond to short essay questions that bring together the major themes of the course. Further explanation of these assignments will be provided in class.

      Paper assignments:       PAPER 1       PAPER 2       PAPER 3       FINAL PAPER

 

materials
 

One book is required for this course, available at the Cornell Bookstore; it is also available on reserve at Mann and Uris Libraries:

David Croteau and William Hoynes, Media / Society: Industries, Images, and Audiences (3rd ed.)
In addition, there are readings available online on the web and through e-reserve.

 


 

 

introduction: the terms of analysis
 

JAN 25: introduction to the class and its concerns

 

JAN 27: "mass media"

Raymond Williams, Keywords, "Media"
Walter Lippmann, "The World Outside and the Pictures in Our Heads"
(read only Ch 1)

FEB 1: "society"

MEDIA/SOCIETY, Ch. 1
Raymond Williams, Keywords, "Society"

FEB 3: "culture"
screening: "Representation and the Media"

Raymond Williams, Keywords, "Culture"
George Lipsitz, Time Passages, "Popular Culture: This Ain't No Sideshow"

 

the production of media
 

FEB 8: media in a capitalist democracy

C. Edwin Baker, Media, Markets, and Democracy, "Not Toasters: The Special Nature of Media Products"
Michael Schudson, "What's Unusual about Covering Politics as Usual"

FEB 10: economics of the media industries

MEDIA/SOCIETY, Ch. 2
Ken Auletta, "Leviathan" New Yorker, (Oct 29, 2001)
explore "Who Owns the Media?" FreePress.net

FEB 15: synergy / intertextuality

Eileen Meehan, "'Holy Commodity Fetish, Batman!' Political Economy of a Commercial Intertext"
Walt Disney Company, Annual Report 2004
(in "Introduction," read "Financial Highlights" and "Letter to Shareholders" [all 8pp.])

FEB 17: media regulation

MEDIA/SOCIETY, Ch. 3

 

the consumption of media
 

FEB 22: media reception in context
paper due

MEDIA/SOCIETY, Ch. 8

FEB 24: the construction of the audience
screening: part of "Signal to Noise, Vol 1"

Ien Ang, "The Nature of the Audience"

MAR 1: television in its domestic context

Roger Silverstone, Why Study the Media?, "House and Home"
Lynn Spigel, "Media Homes: Then and Now"

MAR 3: active interpretation

Stuart Hall, "Encoding / Decoding"

 

the technology of media
 

MAR 8: the impact of the technology

MEDIA/SOCIETY, Ch. 9
Richard Dyer, "Making 'White' People White"

MAR 10: the shaping of technology -- broadcast flag

Roger Silverstone, Television and Everyday Life, "The Tele-technological System"
Peter Forman and Robert W. Saint John, "Creating Convergence" Scientific American (Nov 2000)

 

media / news / politics
 

MAR 15: roles, processes, and news production
screening: part of "Signal to Noise, Vol 2"

MEDIA/SOCIETY, Ch. 4
David Barstow and Robert Stein, "Under Bush, a New Age of Prepackaged TV News," New York Times (March 13, 2005)

MAR 17: news and political movements

Todd Gitlin, The Whole World Is Watching, "Certifying Leaders and Converting Leadership to Celebrity"

 

spring break

 

MAR 29: covering war -- Gulf I
paper due

Gary Woodward, "The Rules of the Game: The Military and the Press in the Persian Gulf War"

MAR 31: covering war -- Gulf II

Greg Mitchell, "Exclusive: U.S. Military Document Outlines War Coverage" Editor & Publisher (February 14, 2003)
Sherry Ricchiardi, "Preparing for War" American Journalism Review (March 2003)
Nicholas Engestrom, "How TV News Scored the Invasion" Columbia Journalism Review (May/June 2003)

APR 5: covering war -- news and nation
screening: part of "Control Room"

Ken Auletta, "Fortress Bush: How the White House Keeps the Press Under Control" New Yorker (Jan 19, 2004)

APR 7: politics in entertainment media

John Corner, "Documentary in a Post-Documentary Culture?"
David Edelstein, "Proper Propaganda" Slate (June 24, 2004)
Christopher Hitchens, "Unfairenheit 9/11" Slate (June 21, 2004)

 

media / representation / culture
 

APR 12: cultural consensus or contest?

Horace Newcomb and Paul Hirsch, "Television as a Cultural Forum"
Todd Gitlin, "Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment"

APR 14: representation and mythmaking
screening: "Merchants of Cool"

MEDIA/SOCIETY, Ch. 5

APR 19: ideology and stereotypes
paper due
screening: "Dreamworlds"

MEDIA/SOCIETY, Ch. 6

APR 21: homosexuality in the media

Joshua Gamson, "Diversity Follies" American Prospect (Jan 3, 2000)
Michael Bronski, "Invisible Exposure" Boston Phoenix (Jan 31 - Feb 7, 2002)
Helene A. Shugart, "Reinventing Privilege: The New (Gay) Man in Contemporary Popular Media"

APR 26: reality TV

Ted Magder, "The End of TV 101: Reality Programs, Formats, and the New Business of Television"
Justin Lewis, "The Meaning of Real Life"

APR 28: media and childhood

David Buckingham, After the Death of Childhood, "Children Viewing Violence"
Ann Hulbert, "Tweens 'R' Us," New York Times (Nov 28, 2004)
Jon Gertner, "Hey Mom, Is It O.K. If These Guys Market Stuff to Us?" New York Times (Nov 28, 2004)

 

future challenges: convergence, global media ecology, and participatory culture
 

MAY 3: globalization and media

MEDIA/SOCIETY, Ch. 10

MAY 5: media ecology, participatory culture, and the remix

Bonnie Nardi and Vicki O'Day, Information Ecologies, "Information Ecologies"
Henry Jenkins, "Quentin Tarantino's Star Wars? Digital Cinema, Media Convergence, and Participatory Culture"
Jonah Peretti, "My Nike Media Adventure"

 

final paper due Thursday May 19th, 5:30pm

 

 

From the Cornell "Code of Academic Integrity":

Absolute integrity is expected of every Cornell student in all academic undertakings. Integrity entails a firm adherence to a set of values, and the values most essential to an academic community are grounded on the concept of honesty with respect to the intellectual efforts of oneself and others. Academic integrity is expected not only in formal coursework situations, but in all University relationships and interactions connected to the educational process, including the use of University resources. While both students and faculty of Cornell assume the responsibility of maintaining and furthering these values, this document is concerned specifically with the conduct of students.

A Cornell student's submission of work for academic credit indicates that the work is the student's own. All outside assistance should be acknowledged, and the student's academic position truthfully reported at all times. In addition, Cornell students have a right to expect academic integrity from each of their peers.

The full text of the Code of Academic Integrity can be found online at

http://web.cornell.edu/UniversityFaculty/docs/AIC.pdf